Obama Administration's Drone Death Figures Don't Add UpReported by Huffington Post on Monday, 18 June 2012 (on June 18, 2012)
|
*By Justin Elliott ProPublica
June 18, 2012, 4:12 p.m. *
Last month, a "senior administration official" said the number of civilians killed in drone strikes in Pakistan under President Obama is in the "single digits." But last year "U.S. officials" said drones in Pakistan killed about 30 civilians in just a yearlong stretch under Obama.
Both claims can't be true.
A centerpiece of President Obama's national security strategy, drones strikes in Pakistan are credited by the administration with crippling Al Qaeda but criticized by human rights groups and others for being conducted in secret and killing civilians*. *The underlying facts are often in dispute and claims about how many people died and who they were vary widely.
So we decided to narrow it down to just one issue: have the administration's own claims been consistent?
We collected claims by the administration about deaths from drone strikes in Pakistan and compared each one not to local reports but rather to other administration claims. The numbers sometimes do not add up. (Check out our interactive graphic to explore the claims.)
Even setting aside the discrepancy between official and outside estimates of civilian deaths, our analysis shows that the administration's own figures quoted over the years raise questions about their credibility.
There have been 307 American drone strikes in Pakistan since 2004, according to a New America Foundation count. Just 44 occurred during the Bush administration. President Obama has greatly expanded the use of drones to attack suspected members of Al Qaeda, the Pakistani Taliban, and other groups in Pakistan's remote northwest region.
Obama officials generally do not comment by name on the drone strikes in Pakistan, but they frequently talk about it to reporters (including us) on condition of anonymity. Often those anonymously sourced comments have come in response to outside tallies of civilian deaths from drone attacks, which are generally much higher than the administration's own figures.
The outright contradiction we noted above comes from two claims made about a year apart:
* *April 22, 2011* McClatchy reports that U.S. officials claim "about 30" civilians died in the year between August 2009 and August 2010.
** May 29, 2012* The New York Times reports that, according to a senior Obama administration official, the number of civilians killed in drone strikes in Pakistan under president Obama is in the "single digits."
As we also show in our interactive graphic, other anonymous administration claims about civilian deaths are possible but imply conclusions that seem improbable.
Consider:
** April 26, 2010 *The Washington Post quotes an "internal CIA accounting" saying that "just over 20 civilians" have been killed by drones in Pakistan since January 2009.
** Aug. 11, 2011 *The New York Times reports that CIA officers claim zero civilians were killed since May 2010
* *Aug. 12, 2011* CNN quoted a U.S. official saying there were 50 civilians killed over the years in drones strike in Pakistan.
If this set of claims is assumed to be accurate, it suggests that the majority of the 50 total civilian deaths occurred during the Bush administration — when the drone program was still in its infancy. As we've noted, in the entire Bush administration, there were 44 strikes. In the Obama administration through Aug. 12, 2011, there were 222. So according to this set of claims more civilians died in just 44 strikes under Bush than did in 222 strikes under Obama. (Again, the graphic is helpful to assess the administration assertions.)
Consider also these three claims, which imply two lengthy periods when zero or almost zero civilians were killed in drone strikes:
* *September 10, 2010 *Newsweek quotes a government estimate that "about 30" civilians were killed since the beginning of 2008.
** April 22, 2011* McClatchy reports that U.S. officials claim "about 30" civilians died in the year between August 2009 and August 2010.
** July 15, 2011 *Reuters quotes a source familiar with the drone program as saying "about 30" civilians were killed since July 2008.
It's possible that all these claims are true. But if they are, it implies that the government believes there were zero or almost zero civilian deaths between the beginning of 2008 and August 2009, and then again zero deaths between August 2010 and July 2011. Those periods comprise a total of 182 strikes.
The administration has rejected in the strongest terms outside claims of a high civilian toll from the drone attacks.
Those outside estimates also vary widely. A count by Bill Roggio, editor of the website the Long War Journal, which bases its estimates on news reports, puts the number of civilian killed in Pakistan at 138. The New America Foundation estimates that, based on press reports, between 293 and 471 civilians have been killed in the attacks. The London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which draws on a wider array of sources including researchers and lawyers in Pakistan, puts the number of civilians killed at between 482 and 832. The authors of the various estimates all emphasize that their counts are imperfect.
There are likely multiple reasons for the varying counts of civilian deaths from drone strikes in Pakistan. The attacks are executed remotely in often inaccessible regions. And there's the question of who U.S. officials are counting as civilians. A story last month in the New York Times reported that President Obama adopted a policy that "in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants."
There are also ongoing debates in the humanitarian law community about who the U.S. may legitimately target with drone strikes and how the CIA is applying the principle of proportionality — which holds that attacks that might cause civilian deaths must be proportional to the level of military advantage anticipated.
In a rare public comment on drone strikes, President Obama told an online town hall in January that the drones had not caused "a huge number of civilian casualties."
When giving their own figures on civilian deaths, administration officials are often countering local reports. In March 2011, for example, Pakistanisincluding the country's army chief accused a U.S. drone strike of hitting a peaceful meeting of tribal elders, killing around 40 people. An unnamed U.S. official rejected the accusations, telling the AP: "There's every indication that this was a group of terrorists, not a charity car wash in the Pakistani hinterlands."
Unnamed U.S. officials told the Los Angeles Times last year that "they are confident they know who has been killed because they watch each strike on video and gather intelligence in the aftermath, observing funerals for the dead and eavesdropping on conversations about the strikes."
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said during a visit to Pakistan this month that there should be investigation of killings of civilians by drones and that victims should be compensated. The U.S. has given compensation to victims of airstrikes in Afghanistan but there are no reports of victims of drone strikes in Pakistan being compensated.
Since the various administration statements over the years were almost all quoted anonymously, it's impossible to go back to the officials in question to ask them about contradictions.
Asked about the apparent contradictions, National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor told ProPublica: "[W]e simply do not comment on alleged drone strikes."
Additional reporting by Cora Currier.
Links:  Full news story
|
|
|
| Recent related news |
| |
This is
2 hours ago | This is Croydon -- ALMOST 100 more people are sleeping rough in Croydon than last year, in what a... |
New Statesman
2 hours ago | We all know that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the outcome to change is a... |
SeattlePI.com
15 hours ago | New MERS virus spreads easily, deadlier than SARS
Associated Press
Copyright 2013 Associated Press.... |
Huffington Post
22 hours ago | "Don't be seduced into thinking that that which does not make a profit is without value."
--Arthur... |
Proactive Investors
2 days ago | *¤ YESTERDAY IN GOLD & SILVER*
The gold price did next to nothing in early Far East trading on... |
| |
Toronto Star
2 days ago | ENNISKILLEN, NORTHERN IRELAND — World leaders meeting here are said to have reached hard-won... |
Huffington Post
1 week ago | *How Dystopian Secrecy Contributes to Clueless Wars*
*Cross-posted with TomDispatch.com*
The... |
| |
|
|
Facebook
E-mail
Twitter
Mixx
StumbleUpon
FriendFeed